Skip to main content

Five (5) Reasons Why JAMB Candidates’ Abduction Should Be a Source of Worry in Nigeria

INTRO: The abduction of young Nigerians travelling to sit for the Joint Admissions and Matriculation Board (JAMB) examination has once again exposed the fragility of public safety in the country. The reasons why JAMB candidates’ abduction should be a source of worry in Nigeria extend far beyond a single unfortunate incident in Benue State. It reflects a dangerous pattern that threatens the very foundation of national development, the education and future of the youth. When children pursuing academic opportunities become targets on the road, it signals that no aspect of ordinary life is truly secure, raising serious concerns about the state’s ability to protect its most vulnerable citizens during critical national processes.

Five (5) Reasons Why JAMB Candidates’ Abduction Should Be a Source of Worry in Nigeria

One of the primary reasons why JAMB candidates’ abduction should be a source of worry in Nigeria is the direct assault it represents on the nation’s human capital and educational aspirations. Every year, over 1.6 million candidates undertake the UTME, many travelling long distances across states to reach designated centres. In the recent Benue incident along the Makurdi–Otukpo road, reports indicated that at least 14 passengers, including individuals believed to be genuine JAMB candidates with examination slips, were kidnapped from a commercial bus. Even though official clarifications later suggested some victims were participating in a police recruitment exercise, the involvement of young people heading for examinations cannot be dismissed lightly. These are not isolated travellers; they are ambitious youths whose success holds the key to family upliftment and national progress. When such journeys turn into nightmares of abduction, it creates widespread fear, discourages participation, and disrupts the pipeline of future professionals, doctors, engineers, and leaders that Nigeria desperately needs.

Another critical reason why JAMB candidates’ abduction should be a source of worry in Nigeria lies in the exposure of systemic insecurity and logistical failures. The Benue episode highlights how poorly maintained roads, banditry, and criminal elements continue to thrive in key corridors during peak examination periods. Candidates from humble backgrounds, relying on public transport because they lack private alternatives, bear the brunt of this vulnerability. Their parents save for years to cover examination fees, only for their children’s dreams to be suspended by violence or the trauma of survival. This reality reveals a troubling lack of priority in governance. While resources flow toward political activities and elite security, basic protective measures for students, such as secure transport corridors, increased examination centres closer to candidates, or coordinated intelligence during UTME seasons, remain inadequate. The incident also underscores how a centralized examination system in a large and diverse country like Nigeria amplifies risks, forcing mass movement that criminals can easily exploit.

Furthermore, the reasons why JAMB candidates’ abduction should be a source of worry in Nigeria include the erosion of public trust in institutions and the cycle of reactive rather than preventive governance. Initial reports of the abduction triggered swift denials from JAMB and security agencies, aimed at calming public anxiety but often perceived as disconnected from ground realities shared by survivors and families. Such responses deepen distrust at a time when transparency is most needed. The pattern is all too familiar: an incident occurs, outrage follows, sympathy statements are issued, and then attention fades until the next tragedy. This routine approach fails to address root causes, leaving ordinary Nigerians, especially those without influence, to carry the heavy burden of state shortcomings. The psychological scars on rescued candidates, missed examination opportunities, and potential loss of an academic year further compound the damage, turning what should be a straightforward educational milestone into a high-stakes gamble with life and future.

Equally alarming among the reasons why JAMB candidates’ abduction should be a source of worry in Nigeria is the broader moral and developmental implication for the country’s future. Education is the bedrock of societal advancement, yet when children must “survive the journey” before earning the right to be examined, the state essentially fails in its basic duty to safeguard the next generation. This not only hampers individual trajectories but also slows national progress. In a nation already battling youth unemployment, restiveness, and brain drain, any disruption to access to tertiary education through fear and insecurity should trigger urgent alarm. The Benue case, involving siblings from the same family in some accounts, illustrates how entire households can be devastated, with ripple effects spreading into communities and diminishing hope in the promise of education as a pathway out of poverty.

The reasons why JAMB candidates’ abduction should be a source of worry in Nigeria also call for immediate structural reforms. Examination logistics must be redesigned with security at the core, through decentralisation of test centres, proactive intelligence, contingency plans for affected candidates, and clear accountability mechanisms. Without these changes, recurring incidents will continue to undermine confidence in national processes and portray Nigeria as a country unable to guarantee even basic safety for its youth. A nation that cannot protect its children on the highway to opportunity is a nation risking its long-term stability and competitiveness.

Conclusion

The abduction linked to JAMB candidates in Benue State should not be treated as just another security headline. The reasons why JAMB candidates’ abduction should be a source of worry in Nigeria are profound: it threatens educational equity, exposes governance failures, erodes institutional trust, inflicts lasting trauma, and jeopardizes the country’s human capital development. Nigerian leaders, security agencies, and education stakeholders must move beyond routine responses to implement concrete preventive measures. Until the journey to sit for examinations becomes safe and reliable for every child, the worry will remain justified, and the future of Nigeria itself will hang in the balance.

P.S

Difficulty getting job interview calls?

Place your order for job-winning resume on Cornelius O. Fiverr gigs for resume writing:

1. I will write and update federal, executive, tech or IT resume or CV

2. I will write solution resume, CV, cover letter and linkedin profile services

3. I will write and edit ats friendly, optimized and compliant CV resume

4. I will start professional resume CV writing service from scratch

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...