Four (4) Top Reasons Why Rivers State House of Assembly in Nigeria Proceeds with Impeachment Plans Against Governor Fubara and Deputy

IntroductionIn the escalating political drama in Rivers State, the House of Assembly has intensified its push to impeach Governor Siminalayi Fubara and his deputy, Prof. Ngozi Nma Odu. On January 16, 2026, the Assembly, under Speaker Martin Amaewhule, sent letters to Chief Judge Justice Simeon Chibuzor Amadi, requesting a seven-member panel to probe allegations of gross misconduct. This move comes amid a deep-seated crisis, rooted in accusations of financial impropriety and constitutional violations. Despite a court interim order restraining the Chief Judge from acting, the Assembly's determination highlights ongoing tensions, possibly influenced by former Governor Nyesom Wike's allies. Here, we break down the key reasons driving this impeachment effort, optimized for those searching "reasons for impeaching Fubara" or "Rivers State impeachment updates."1. Allegations of Extra-Budgetary Spending and Financial MisconductA primary trigger for the impeachment is claims of reckless financial management. The Assembly accuses Governor Fubara of authorizing over ₦800 billion in extra-budgetary expenditures without legislative approval. This includes unconstitutional spending of public funds, which lawmakers argue breaches Section 188 of the 1999 Nigerian Constitution. Such actions are seen as undermining fiscal accountability in Rivers State, a resource-rich region. The deputy governor faces similar charges, with the Assembly viewing these as gross misconduct warranting removal. This financial angle resonates in searches for "Fubara financial scandals," emphasizing the need for transparency in governance.2. Withholding Statutory Funds from the AssemblyAnother core reason is the alleged withholding of statutory allocations to the Rivers State House of Assembly Service Commission. Lawmakers claim this hampers their operations and violates principles of legislative autonomy, as upheld by Supreme Court rulings. By starving the Assembly of funds, Fubara is accused of attempting to weaken an independent arm of government. This issue escalated after the governor reportedly ignored a seven-day notice to respond to these allegations, prompting the House to proceed with the Chief Judge letter. For those querying "House of Assembly vs Fubara funds dispute," this underscores a power struggle over resource control.3. Demolition of the Assembly ComplexThe controversial demolition of the Rivers State House of Assembly complex is cited as a blatant act of defiance. Lawmakers argue this was done without due process, symbolizing an attack on democratic institutions. The act is linked to broader accusations of manipulating public opinion and leaders against the House, rather than addressing grievances. This physical destruction has fueled resentment, making it a pivotal reason in the impeachment narrative. Searches like "Fubara Assembly demolition reasons" often highlight this as evidence of authoritarian tendencies.4. Defiance of Supreme Court Rulings and Political ManipulationThe Assembly points to Fubara's alleged disregard for Supreme Court decisions on legislative independence. Additionally, there's blame for failing to honor a peace agreement brokered by President Bola Tinubu, despite appeals from stakeholders. Lawmakers accuse the governor of influencing constituents to withdraw support from the process, calling it undemocratic. This has led to a stalemate, with 25 members voting to investigate, even as some backed out.Current Status and ImplicationsAs of January 17, 2026, a High Court injunction has temporarily halted the Chief Judge from forming the panel, lasting seven days. Yet, the Assembly's persistence signals no retreat. This crisis could reshape Rivers politics, affecting stability in Nigeria's oil hub. For updates on "Fubara impeachment latest," stay tuned—democracy hangs in the balance.