Skip to main content

Reasons Nigeria Should Expand Industrialization and Manufacturing

Industrialization has long been recognized as a transformative force for economic growth and social well-being, and its importance becomes even more apparent when examining the global disparities that exist today. In an increasingly interconnected world, only a select group of economies have achieved the status of industrialized nations, yet these countries are responsible for generating more than half of the world’s manufactured goods. This stark imbalance underscores the potential benefits that could be unlocked if countries like Nigeria were to expand their industrial and manufacturing sectors. As the global economy continues to grapple with the challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic, the case for accelerating industrialization in Nigeria has never been stronger, as it promises not only to boost economic resilience but also to elevate the quality of life for millions of its citizens.

The global landscape reveals that industrialized economies, though representing less than 20 percent of the world’s population, have been able to harness their industrial might to create advanced technological environments, generate high-skilled employment, and improve living standards. By contrast, the least developed countries (LDCs) – which account for a significant proportion of the global population – produce only a minuscule share of manufactured goods. The disparity in industrial output is not just a matter of economic statistics; it is a reflection of the different levels of access to better education, healthcare, and infrastructure. For Nigeria, a country with immense potential and a large, youthful population, the expansion of industrial and manufacturing sectors could be the catalyst for a broad-based economic transformation. This expansion could pave the way for more diversified growth, reducing overreliance on sectors such as oil and agriculture that have historically dominated the Nigerian economy.

The recent global economic downturn caused by the COVID-19 pandemic has further exposed the vulnerabilities of economies that lack a robust industrial base. In many LDCs, manufacturing growth has nearly come to a halt, with projections for the current year showing only marginal improvements in manufacturing value added compared to pre-pandemic levels. For Nigeria, this period of global disruption presents a unique opportunity to reimagine its economic future by investing in industrialization. A strategic emphasis on manufacturing can provide Nigeria with a more stable economic foundation, mitigating the risks associated with fluctuations in global commodity prices and the uncertainties of an ever-changing global economic environment.

Industrial development does more than just drive GDP growth—it has a profound impact on the overall well-being of a nation’s population. Countries that have embraced industrialization often see marked improvements in human development indicators. These improvements include higher levels of education, better healthcare services, and enhanced social safety nets. For instance, robust industrial sectors foster technological innovation and create an environment in which skills are continuously upgraded. This cycle of innovation and skill development is critical in moving away from low-wage, labor-intensive industries toward sectors that offer higher wages and more secure employment. In Nigeria, where the youth unemployment rate remains a significant concern, expanding the manufacturing sector could generate high-skilled, better-paying jobs, thereby reducing poverty and enhancing social mobility.

The correlation between industrialization and improved living standards is well documented. Data from international studies have demonstrated a strong link between higher manufacturing value added per capita and enhanced human development outcomes. In industrialized countries, the benefits of a thriving manufacturing sector extend well beyond economic growth—they are evident in the quality of education, lower rates of child labor, and increased access to healthcare and technology. Nigeria, with its vast natural and human resources, stands to benefit immensely by following a similar trajectory. By channeling investments into industrial sectors, Nigerian policymakers could stimulate innovation, spur job creation, and ultimately reduce the prevalence of poverty. Moreover, as industries expand, the increased tax revenues could be reinvested into public services, thereby creating a virtuous cycle of development that lifts overall living standards.

One of the most compelling arguments for Nigeria to focus on industrialization is its potential to reduce economic inequality and improve the distribution of wealth across the country. In many developing economies, the lack of a robust industrial base means that growth is often concentrated in a few sectors, leaving large segments of the population without access to quality jobs or services. Industrialization has the power to democratize economic opportunity by creating a more diverse job market that spans various skill levels and regions. This diversification is essential for a country like Nigeria, where regional disparities and income inequality have long been sources of social tension. By fostering a more inclusive industrial environment, Nigeria could ensure that the benefits of economic growth are shared more equitably among its citizens.

Another important facet of industrialization is its role in driving technological change and innovation. As industries develop, they create a demand for research and development, which in turn spurs technological advancements that have wide-ranging benefits. These innovations often lead to improvements in productivity and efficiency across various sectors, contributing to a more competitive economy. For Nigeria, investing in industrial and manufacturing capabilities is not merely about building factories—it is about establishing an ecosystem that encourages creativity, learning, and continuous improvement. This environment can support the emergence of homegrown technologies and innovative business practices that are tailored to the unique needs of the Nigerian market, positioning the country as a competitive player on the global stage.

The transformation brought about by industrialization also has profound implications for social development. As economies become more industrialized, the quality of public services typically improves. With increased industrial output comes a rise in government revenues, which can be used to invest in critical infrastructure such as roads, schools, and hospitals. In turn, these investments enhance the overall well-being of the population by ensuring that essential services are accessible to all, regardless of socioeconomic status. In Nigeria, where public service delivery has often been a challenge, a more diversified and industrially driven economy could provide the necessary resources to overhaul and improve infrastructure, ultimately leading to better health outcomes, increased educational opportunities, and improved quality of life.

The benefits of industrialization extend to addressing one of the most pressing challenges faced by Nigeria and many other developing nations—youth unemployment. With a burgeoning population of young people, Nigeria is at a critical juncture where the creation of meaningful employment opportunities is essential for sustaining long-term economic and social stability. By expanding its industrial and manufacturing sectors, Nigeria can offer its youth a pathway to gainful employment, skill development, and upward social mobility. This not only helps in reducing unemployment rates but also in curbing the potential for social unrest that can arise from economic disenfranchisement. The creation of high-quality jobs in the industrial sector can act as a bulwark against the negative effects of economic shocks, providing a stable foundation for future growth.

It is also important to consider the broader implications of a more industrialized economy for Nigeria’s international trade prospects. A well-developed manufacturing sector can enable Nigeria to diversify its export base, reducing reliance on a narrow range of commodities such as oil. This diversification is critical in the face of volatile global markets, as it allows Nigeria to tap into new markets and create a more resilient economic framework. By enhancing its industrial capabilities, Nigeria can position itself as a key player in regional and global value chains, attracting foreign investment and technology transfer that further catalyze economic development.

The challenges posed by the COVID-19 pandemic have brought to light the urgent need for economic diversification and resilience. For Nigeria, the pandemic has underscored vulnerabilities in relying heavily on sectors that are susceptible to global disruptions. Expanding industrialization and manufacturing offers a strategic pathway to build a more robust and diversified economy that can better withstand external shocks. The evidence is clear: economies that invest in their industrial sectors not only recover faster from crises but also emerge stronger and more competitive in the long term. By reorienting its economic strategy towards industrial growth, Nigeria could safeguard its future against similar disruptions and build a foundation for sustainable development.

The path to industrialization, however, is not without its challenges. It requires a concerted effort from both the public and private sectors to create an environment conducive to industrial growth. For Nigeria, this means implementing policies that promote innovation, provide incentives for investment in manufacturing, and streamline regulatory frameworks to attract both local and foreign investors. It also involves investing in education and skills development to ensure that the workforce is prepared to meet the demands of a modern industrial economy. These steps, though challenging, are necessary for laying the groundwork for a transformative shift that can drive Nigeria’s economic and social progress for decades to come.

Bottom line, the evidence from global studies on industrial development makes a compelling case for Nigeria to expand its industrialization and manufacturing sectors. The benefits are multifaceted: enhanced economic resilience, improved employment prospects, better quality of life, and a more equitable distribution of wealth. With a clear correlation between industrialization and improved human development indicators, Nigeria has much to gain by pursuing policies that encourage industrial growth. The current global environment, marked by economic uncertainty and the disruptive impacts of a pandemic, further amplifies the urgency of this transition. By embracing industrialization, Nigeria can unlock new avenues for growth, create a vibrant and inclusive economy, and set the stage for a future where every citizen has the opportunity to thrive.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...