Skip to main content

Reasons Why Nigeria is a Developing Country

Nigeria’s status as a developing country is the result of a complex interplay of historical, economic, demographic, and infrastructural factors that have shaped its growth trajectory over decades. At its core, a developing country is characterized by an ongoing process of industrialization, efforts toward economic stability, and the drive to elevate living standards for its citizens. Nigeria, endowed with vast natural resources and a vibrant, youthful population, embodies many of these characteristics, yet it simultaneously grapples with challenges that are emblematic of nations in the process of development. The reasons why Nigeria is a developing country is hereunder discussed.

One of the foremost reasons Nigeria is considered a developing country is its relatively low per capita income. Despite being Africa’s largest economy and a nation with substantial oil revenues, the wealth generated is not evenly distributed among its more than 200 million citizens. A significant portion of the population lives below the poverty line, and many households struggle to access the benefits of economic growth. This uneven distribution of income is partly due to the heavy reliance on a single resource—oil—which makes the economy vulnerable to fluctuations in global oil prices. When oil prices drop, Nigeria’s national income suffers, and the limited diversification in its industrial base means that there are few alternative revenue streams to cushion the impact on everyday citizens.

The rapid population growth in Nigeria further exacerbates the challenges of development. A burgeoning population means that the demand for jobs, education, healthcare, and other social services increases at a rate that often outpaces the government’s ability to provide. High birth rates, combined with improvements in healthcare that have reduced infant mortality, result in a large, young population that, while full of potential, also places enormous pressure on existing infrastructure and public services. This population dynamic makes it difficult for the economy to grow on a per capita basis, as the resources available must be spread thinner with each new generation. The struggle to convert this demographic dividend into sustainable economic growth remains one of the critical issues for Nigeria.

Another crucial aspect is the country’s dependence on agriculture and natural resources. While Nigeria is globally known for its oil reserves, a large segment of the population still depends on agriculture for livelihood. This duality in the economic structure means that while the oil sector brings in significant revenue, the majority of citizens in rural areas remain engaged in subsistence farming or small-scale agriculture. This reliance on primary sector activities exposes the country to the vagaries of global commodity markets and climatic uncertainties. When agricultural productivity is hit by droughts or other adverse conditions, it directly impacts food security and the income of millions of Nigerians, further impeding overall economic development.

Inadequate infrastructure is a persistent and widely acknowledged challenge in Nigeria. The country suffers from chronic deficiencies in key areas such as electricity, transportation, water supply, and sanitation. Power shortages, in particular, have long been a stumbling block for industrial and economic development. Frequent blackouts disrupt businesses, hinder manufacturing processes, and affect the daily lives of citizens. Moreover, the poor state of roads and transportation networks in many parts of the country limits access to markets, healthcare, and education, especially in rural areas. These infrastructural weaknesses not only slow down economic progress but also contribute to regional disparities, where urban centers like Lagos and Abuja are significantly more developed compared to the countryside.

Health challenges further contribute to Nigeria’s developing country status. The prevalence of infectious diseases, coupled with a strained healthcare system, continues to impact life expectancy and overall public health. High rates of diseases such as malaria, HIV/AIDS, and other endemic infections place a significant burden on the population, affecting labor productivity and increasing healthcare costs. In many communities, access to quality healthcare is limited by inadequate facilities, a shortage of trained medical personnel, and insufficient public health funding. This results in a cycle where poor health outcomes reduce the capacity of individuals to contribute effectively to the economy, which in turn hinders overall national development.

Education and human capital formation also play a pivotal role in Nigeria’s developmental challenges. Although there are pockets of excellence in higher education and research, many regions suffer from underfunded and overcrowded schools, a lack of trained teachers, and limited access to modern educational resources. The low literacy rates and insufficient vocational training mean that a significant segment of the population does not acquire the skills needed for higher-value economic activities. This limitation in human capital formation restricts innovation, reduces overall productivity, and makes it difficult for Nigeria to transition from a resource-based economy to a more diversified and knowledge-driven one.

The historical context of colonialism and its long-lasting impacts cannot be ignored when analyzing Nigeria’s current economic landscape. During the colonial period, the economic structures were designed primarily to extract resources and serve the interests of colonial powers. This legacy has had a lasting impact on the nation’s development, as post-independence governments have had to contend with institutions and infrastructures that were not originally designed to support comprehensive national development. The historical extraction of resources without reinvestment in local industrialization or education laid the groundwork for many of the challenges Nigeria faces today. The unequal relationships established during colonial times have evolved into modern economic dependencies, where foreign investment and international loans play a significant role in the national economy, sometimes creating cycles of debt that further hinder sustainable growth.

Corruption is another critical factor that has significantly slowed Nigeria’s progress. Corruption affects nearly every level of government and public administration, undermining trust in institutions and diverting resources away from essential services like education, healthcare, and infrastructure development. The mismanagement of public funds means that even when resources are available, they do not necessarily translate into improvements in the quality of life for the average citizen. Instead, funds are often siphoned off by corrupt officials or misallocated in projects that do not address the country’s most pressing needs. This systemic issue has a ripple effect, discouraging both domestic and foreign investment and stifling entrepreneurial initiatives that could otherwise drive innovation and growth.

Furthermore, external debt and financial instability continue to challenge Nigeria’s development prospects. In its bid to improve public services and infrastructure, Nigeria has often resorted to borrowing from international agencies and other nations. While such loans can provide a temporary boost, they also come with high interest rates and strict conditions that may not always align with the country’s development priorities. The burden of debt repayment can consume a significant portion of national revenue, leaving fewer funds available for investments in critical sectors. This reliance on external financing creates a cycle where economic growth is stunted by the need to service debt, limiting the country’s ability to invest in long-term development projects that could otherwise enhance productivity and improve living standards.

The interplay of these factors creates a scenario where Nigeria is in a continuous state of transition. On one hand, there are signs of progress: burgeoning entrepreneurial sectors, a growing technology scene, and pockets of economic dynamism in major cities. On the other hand, deep-seated structural issues, such as income inequality, infrastructural deficiencies, and institutional weaknesses, prevent the nation from achieving the full benefits of its economic potential. The rapid pace of urbanization in Nigeria has led to the growth of mega-cities that act as engines of economic activity, yet these same urban centers also face challenges related to overcrowding, inadequate public services, and environmental degradation.

In this complex tapestry of development, it is also important to note that the label “developing country” is not without controversy. Critics argue that the term oversimplifies the unique trajectories of nations like Nigeria by imposing a uniform standard of development that may not capture the country’s diverse economic realities and cultural contexts. Instead, some scholars and policymakers advocate for a more nuanced approach that focuses on specific socio-economic indicators rather than broad categorizations. For Nigeria, this means recognizing both its strengths—such as its large, youthful labor force and abundant natural resources—and its weaknesses, like poor infrastructure and pervasive corruption. Such a balanced perspective is essential for formulating policies that address the multifaceted nature of development and for charting a course toward more sustainable and inclusive growth.

Despite these challenges, Nigeria’s journey as a developing country is also marked by resilience and a relentless pursuit of progress. The government and various non-governmental organizations have launched initiatives aimed at reforming the education system, improving healthcare services, and investing in infrastructure. There is a growing recognition that to harness its full potential, Nigeria must diversify its economy away from its heavy reliance on oil and instead invest in sectors such as technology, manufacturing, and agriculture. Efforts to modernize the agricultural sector, for example, include initiatives to improve productivity through better farming techniques and the introduction of new technologies. Similarly, the push for improved energy infrastructure, although still in its early stages, holds promise for reducing the chronic power shortages that have long plagued the country.

The dynamic interplay between Nigeria’s abundant resources and its structural challenges paints a picture of a nation that is rich in potential but hampered by longstanding issues. The country’s struggle to achieve a higher standard of living for its people is emblematic of the broader challenges faced by many developing nations. As Nigeria continues to navigate the complex landscape of economic development, it must balance the need for immediate reforms with long-term strategies that foster sustainable growth. The future of Nigeria, like that of many developing countries, hinges on its ability to implement policies that not only address the symptoms of underdevelopment but also tackle the root causes—whether they be institutional, economic, or social.

In summary, Nigeria’s classification as a developing country is not merely a label, but a reflection of a multifaceted reality. The combination of low per capita income, rapid population growth, a heavy dependence on both natural resources and agriculture, inadequate infrastructure, public health challenges, limited human capital, historical legacies, and systemic corruption all contribute to a developmental landscape that is as challenging as it is dynamic. While there are certainly signs of progress and promise, the obstacles remain formidable. For Nigeria to move decisively toward becoming a fully developed economy, it will need to address these issues through comprehensive reforms, strategic investments, and a commitment to inclusive growth that ensures every citizen can share in the nation’s prosperity.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...