Skip to main content

Reasons for, and Causes of Low Agricultural Productivity in Nigeria

Over the past few years, Nigeria’s agricultural sector has been grappling with severe challenges that have led to a marked decline in crop production. Agricultural productivity in Nigeria  faces harsh climatic conditions, suffers crude farm tools, and among other things bears poor access to credit. Between the first quarter of 2020 and the first quarter of 2022, crop production in Nigeria fell by an astonishing 47.2%, a decline that has significant repercussions for the national economy and the everyday lives of its people. Crop production, which is the largest sub-sector within agriculture, currently contributes a remarkable 92.05% to the nominal growth of Nigeria’s GDP for the first quarter of 2022. This startling statistic underscores the critical role that agriculture plays in the nation’s economic framework, as well as the urgent need to address the myriad factors that have undermined agricultural productivity across the country.

One of the primary reasons for the downturn in agricultural productivity is the reliance on crude farming implements that are ill-suited to the demands of modern agriculture. Many Nigerian farmers continue to use basic tools that have changed little over the years. The use of such rudimentary implements restricts the potential for increased output because they do not allow for the mechanization and technological advancements that are essential for higher yields. The situation is further exacerbated by deeply entrenched issues related to land tenure and land fragmentation. In Nigeria, farmland is often divided among many smallholders, making it difficult for any one farmer to operate on a scale that would allow for the efficient application of modern farming techniques. This fragmentation of land not only complicates efforts to adopt large-scale farming practices but also leads to inefficient land use and underutilization of available resources.

Inadequate access to credit facilities compounds the challenges faced by the agricultural sector. Many farmers are unable to secure the necessary financial support to invest in modern equipment, quality fertilizers, or improved storage facilities. Without the capital to industrialize their operations, farmers are forced to rely on subsistence methods that are both labor-intensive and inefficient. This financial constraint is particularly problematic in a sector where even small improvements in production methods could lead to significant increases in yield and economic output. Although the government has implemented several interventions designed to boost agricultural production—such as the Anchor Borrowers Program—many farmers still struggle to obtain the credit they need to transition from traditional practices to more modern, commercially viable methods.

The infrastructural challenges that plague Nigeria’s agricultural sector also contribute heavily to its low productivity. The inadequate development of storage and transportation facilities, such as feeder roads, means that even when crops are produced, a significant portion of the harvest is lost before it can reach the market. Poor infrastructure not only leads to wastage but also increases the cost of getting produce to consumers, further diminishing the profitability of farming. The logistical hurdles that arise from insufficient storage and transportation networks limit the ability of farmers to take advantage of their produce fully, leading to lower overall yields and reduced economic gains.

Moreover, there has been a chronic underinvestment in research and extension services within the agricultural sector. The lack of robust research initiatives means that new farming techniques, improved seed varieties, and effective pest control measures are not being developed or disseminated widely among Nigerian farmers. Extension services, which play a crucial role in educating farmers about modern agricultural practices, are either underfunded or poorly implemented. This neglect leaves farmers reliant on outdated methods that yield lower productivity and contribute to significant post-harvest losses. The failure to innovate in agricultural practices creates a cycle of stagnation, where the same ineffective methods are repeated season after season, preventing any meaningful improvement in productivity.

Weather and climate-related challenges further complicate the agricultural landscape. Nigeria is no stranger to the impacts of erratic weather patterns, and periods of low rainfall have a particularly devastating effect on crop yields. When rainfall is insufficient, planting cycles are disrupted, and crops fail to mature as expected. The absence of comprehensive irrigation systems leaves farmers vulnerable to these natural variations, exacerbating the negative impact on production. Climate change, with its associated unpredictability, poses an ongoing threat to agricultural stability, as farmers struggle to adapt to conditions that are increasingly outside the bounds of historical patterns.

The issue of pricing policy also plays a significant role in the low productivity of Nigeria’s agricultural sector. Unstable and often unpredictable pricing for agricultural produce undermines farmers’ confidence and discourages them from investing in higher output. When prices fluctuate wildly, it becomes difficult for farmers to plan their production and make the necessary investments in inputs such as quality seeds and fertilizers. This volatility in pricing erodes the morale of the farming community and contributes to a general sense of uncertainty that stifles productivity. The lack of a consistent and fair pricing policy not only affects the immediate income of farmers but also has long-term implications for the overall sustainability of the agricultural sector.

Beyond these structural and economic challenges, biological and environmental threats have also taken a toll on crop production. Pests and grazing animals are known to inflict significant damage on farmlands, destroying crops and reducing yields even before harvest. The destructive activities of these pests, combined with the grazing of animals on cultivated land, directly lower productivity and contribute to the overall decline in agricultural output. Natural disasters, such as floods, droughts, and other weather-related calamities, further diminish the resilience of the sector. These environmental threats add another layer of complexity to an already fragile agricultural system, making it even more difficult for farmers to achieve sustainable levels of productivity.

Insecurity remains one of the most persistent challenges affecting agricultural activities in Nigeria. The nation has been besieged by a range of security issues, including conflicts involving Boko Haram, kidnappings for ransom, violent clashes between farmers and herders, and various ethnic confrontations. These forms of insecurity have had a profound impact on agricultural productivity, as they disrupt daily farming activities and create a pervasive atmosphere of fear and uncertainty. Reports indicate that farmer-herder clashes have become increasingly deadly, forcing many farmers to abandon their fields for fear of violence. This situation not only results in immediate losses in crop production but also discourages potential investments in the sector, as the risks associated with farming become too great to bear.

A further impediment to increased agricultural productivity is the widespread reluctance to adopt modern technology among Nigerian farmers. Despite the clear benefits of mechanization and modern farming methods, many continue to rely on traditional techniques such as using cutlasses and hoes for cultivation. These methods, while deeply rooted in the agricultural heritage of the country, are not conducive to the high-output, efficient production needed to meet the demands of a growing population. In addition, local methods of preserving farm produce are often inadequate, leading to significant spoilage and wastage before the crops can reach consumers. The slow pace of technological adoption in the agricultural sector not only hampers efforts to boost productivity but also places Nigeria at a competitive disadvantage in the international market.

The repercussions of the declining crop production extend far beyond the fields. There is a well-documented inverse relationship between crop production and food inflation; as production falls, food inflation rises. In recent years, Nigeria has experienced a sharp increase in food prices, a trend that is directly linked to the downturn in agricultural output. Rising food inflation places a tremendous strain on the population, particularly among the most vulnerable segments of society. The increase in prices affects everyday consumers and can lead to a food crisis, as has been evidenced by the fact that 14.4 million people in Nigeria are currently facing food insecurity. This situation is further aggravated by the displacement of individuals due to various security challenges, which only serves to deepen the food crisis and elevate the risk of widespread undernutrition and poor health outcomes.

The economic ramifications of low agricultural productivity are extensive. Reduced crop production leads to a decline in agricultural exports, which in turn diminishes overall export revenue and contributes to widening trade deficits. For an economy that heavily relies on agriculture as a cornerstone of its GDP, such declines are particularly alarming. The drop in production not only affects the supply of food but also undermines the nation’s economic stability by reducing export earnings and hampering economic growth. The resultant trade deficits and sluggish economic performance further exacerbate issues such as unemployment and poverty, creating a cycle that is difficult to break.

In response to these challenges, many experts argue that achieving food security in Nigeria will require a comprehensive overhaul of the agricultural sector. This transformation involves creating an enabling environment that addresses the diverse and interrelated issues hampering productivity. Critical reforms must be implemented to improve access to finance, thereby enabling farmers to invest in mechanized farming and modern inputs. In addition, the development of better infrastructure, particularly in terms of storage and transportation networks, is essential for reducing post-harvest losses and ensuring that produce reaches the market in good condition. Equally important is the need for a significant investment in research and extension services, which can provide farmers with the latest knowledge and techniques necessary for modern, efficient farming.

Addressing the pervasive insecurity that affects agricultural activities is also paramount. The persistent threat of violence and communal clashes not only disrupts production but also creates an environment of uncertainty that deters investment in the sector. It is critical for the government and other stakeholders to work together to implement measures that enhance security and promote stability. By mitigating the risks associated with conflicts—whether they stem from extremist groups, farmer-herder clashes, or ethnic tensions—Nigeria can create a safer environment in which agricultural activities can resume and thrive.

Furthermore, the transformation of Nigeria’s agricultural sector requires a shift towards modern technology and practices. Encouraging farmers to adopt mechanization and advanced farming techniques will be key to reversing the current trends in low productivity. Investments in improved seed varieties, advanced preservation techniques, and efficient irrigation systems are necessary to boost crop yields and reduce losses due to spoilage and weather-related challenges. While traditional methods have served farmers for generations, the demands of a modern economy necessitate a transition to more efficient and sustainable practices. This modernization effort, if implemented effectively, could lead to a significant increase in agricultural output and contribute to the overall economic recovery of the country.

Another aspect that warrants urgent attention is the financial ecosystem that supports agricultural activities. Many farmers, particularly those operating on a small scale, lack the necessary access to credit and other financial services that could enable them to expand their operations and modernize their practices. Although government initiatives such as the Anchor Borrowers Program have been introduced to alleviate this issue, the impact has been limited by structural challenges in the financial sector. Developing a more inclusive and robust financial system that caters to the unique needs of the agricultural community is essential for unlocking the sector’s full potential.

The long-term consequences of the current agricultural crisis are far-reaching. As crop production continues to decline, the resulting increase in food inflation poses a significant threat to the livelihoods of millions of Nigerians. The relationship between low production and rising food prices creates a vicious cycle, one that can lead to widespread food insecurity and exacerbate existing problems such as poverty and undernutrition. In the face of these challenges, it becomes clear that the fate of Nigeria’s agricultural sector is inextricably linked to the nation’s overall economic health and social stability.

Bottom line, the decline in crop production in Nigeria is a multifaceted problem that stems from a combination of outdated farming practices, inadequate infrastructural and financial support, adverse weather conditions, insecure land tenure, unstable pricing policies, biological threats, and pervasive insecurity. Each of these factors contributes to the overall picture of low agricultural productivity, which in turn has serious implications for food security, economic stability, and the well-being of the nation’s citizens. The path forward requires a concerted effort by policymakers, industry stakeholders, and the international community to implement comprehensive reforms that address both the immediate challenges and the deep-rooted systemic issues. Only through such decisive and coordinated action can Nigeria hope to reverse the current trends and pave the way for a more prosperous and secure future in agriculture.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...