Skip to main content

Reasons for, and Causes of Food Insecurity in Nigeria

Food security which is simply the availability and accessibility of foods, is instrumental to understanding food insecurity. Practically, food security can be defined as the condition in which every person has access to enough food to meet their daily energy needs—roughly 2,200 to 2,300 calories for an adult female and about 2,900 to 3,000 calories (which is approximately 8–10 kilograms of maize flour) for an adult male—with children needing proportionally less to remain healthy. When a nation is unable to provide these minimum calorie levels for its citizens, it is typically described as experiencing food insecurity.

In recent times, food insecurity in Nigeria has reached unprecedented levels, emerging as one of the nation’s most pressing challenges. A closer examination of the current situation reveals a complex interplay of factors that have exacerbated the struggle for food among millions of Nigerians. Over the past several years, severe food shortages have become a recurring crisis, with nearly one in every ten Nigerians experiencing extreme hunger. This worrying statistic is underscored by reports that predict, between June and August 2024, about 31.5 million people in the country will face severe food scarcity—a crisis that has compelled the highest levels of government to declare a state of emergency in order to address the situation.

At the heart of Nigeria’s food insecurity are multifaceted issues that include persistent conflict, deteriorating economic conditions, and the far-reaching impacts of climate change. The country’s agricultural landscape has been marred by conflicts such as armed banditry and kidnapping in key food-producing regions. These acts of violence not only directly endanger the lives of farmers but also disrupt the entire agricultural supply chain, resulting in significant losses in food production and distribution. When farmers are targeted, the cultivation process itself becomes risky, and investments in farming are undermined, leading to reduced output. Such challenges are compounded by the high levels of poverty that grip a substantial segment of the population, with 40.1% of Nigerians living below the poverty line. This acute poverty means that even when food is available, a significant portion of the population cannot afford to purchase it, thereby intensifying the cycle of hunger and malnutrition.

Economic instability has also played a critical role in worsening the food crisis. In recent years, research conducted by international organizations such as the Food and Agricultural Organization (FAO) has shown that nearly half of Nigerian households have experienced a 45% decrease in their primary source of income. This dramatic loss of purchasing power has left millions struggling to secure basic nutritional needs. Meanwhile, rising food prices—driven by inflation and other economic pressures—have further alienated many from the food market. As prices continue to soar, the ability of everyday Nigerians to access essential commodities diminishes, placing additional strain on an already fragile food system.

Climate change is another major cause of food insecurity in Nigeria, with its effects making traditional farming practices increasingly unsustainable. Extreme weather patterns, environmental disasters, and prolonged periods of drought or flooding have all taken a toll on Nigeria’s agricultural output. These climatic challenges not only reduce crop yields but also lead to unpredictable growing seasons, making it harder for farmers to plan and invest in their agricultural activities. The resulting decline in food production is not limited to the fields alone; it ripples through the entire supply chain. Post-harvest losses—estimated at around 15 million metric tons—are a testament to the inefficiencies in handling, storage, and distribution. This massive waste further constrains the availability of food, ensuring that even when crops are harvested, a significant proportion never reaches the market.

Historically, Nigeria once boasted a robust and self-sufficient food system. Before the discovery and subsequent exploitation of crude oil in the late 1950s, the nation’s diverse regions thrived on their agricultural outputs. The West was celebrated for its abundant cocoa farms, the North for its vast groundnut production, the Mid-west for rubber, and the East for its thriving oil palm plantations. However, the oil boom shifted national priorities, leading to a gradual neglect of agriculture. This diversion of attention and resources resulted in a systemic decline in food production capacities, and today, Nigeria finds itself grappling with the consequences of this long-term neglect.

The country’s increasing reliance on food imports further underscores the extent of the crisis. In 2022, Nigeria’s food import bill rose by 5% to N1.9 trillion, a figure that has been on a steady incline since 2017 when imports were recorded at N857.6 billion. The following year, the Central Bank of Nigeria reported an even more dramatic jump—a 45 percent increase that saw the food import bill soar to $2.71 billion (approximately N1.12 trillion). This reliance on imported food not only signals the inability of domestic production to meet the demands of a rapidly growing population—now exceeding 226.2 million people—but also exposes the country to the volatility of global food markets. External factors such as fluctuating international prices and global supply chain disruptions further exacerbate the food scarcity issue, leaving the nation vulnerable to shocks that are beyond its immediate control.

In response to this escalating crisis, the Nigerian government has been proactive in seeking assistance from international partners. Major organizations like the World Bank, USAID, and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD) have extended support to bolster the nation’s agricultural sector. The FAO, in particular, has initiated around 20 programs and projects aimed at transforming Nigeria’s agricultural landscape. These efforts are designed to modernize the agricultural sector, promote sustainable farming practices, and ultimately restore food security to the nation. Despite these promising initiatives, the gap between production and demand remains wide. Even with a reported 39.6 percent increase in food production in recent years and a modest 1.5 percent growth in the agricultural sector in real terms during the second quarter of 2023 compared to the previous year, domestic production still falls short of fulfilling the needs of the entire population.

The socio-economic repercussions of food insecurity are deeply felt by the Nigerian populace. The increasing costs of essential commodities, driven by a combination of inflation, supply chain inefficiencies, and corruption, have left many Nigerians frustrated and desperate. The situation has led to widespread public unrest and dissatisfaction with the government's handling of the crisis. The link between poverty, malnutrition, and hunger is unmistakable, with many citizens bearing the brunt of systemic neglect. As food prices soar, the economic divide widens, and the most vulnerable communities are forced to make difficult choices between basic necessities and other critical expenses.

Addressing this multifaceted problem requires a comprehensive and coordinated approach that goes beyond short-term fixes. While immediate measures such as subsidized food distribution, cash transfers, and nutritional support are necessary to alleviate the suffering of those currently affected, long-term solutions must target the root causes of the crisis. One of the key strategies involves revitalizing the agricultural sector through a combination of public-private partnerships, technological innovation, and enhanced support for smallholder farmers. Smallholder farmers, estimated at around 38 million and constituting roughly 20% of Nigeria’s population, are the backbone of the country’s agricultural production. Empowering these farmers with access to modern tools, improved seeds, and fertilizers can lead to significant increases in local food production. The government has already taken steps in this direction, with President Bola Tinubu’s commitment to ensuring ongoing food availability by initiating plans to cultivate 500,000 hectares of farmland across the nation. This ambitious plan includes the cultivation of essential crops such as maize, rice, wheat, and millet, which are critical to enhancing food security and promoting economic stability.

Furthermore, initiatives like the National Wheat Development Programme, which aims to increase agricultural yields by promoting the use of high-yield seedling varieties, represent a critical component of the broader strategy to combat food insecurity. In Jigawa state, for instance, the government has raised targets to cover 123,000 hectares of farmland, with the expectation that these efforts will double the output from this region. Alongside these efforts, the implementation of price intelligence databases to monitor and control market fluctuations is a vital measure to ensure that food prices remain fair and accessible. By curbing the influence of corrupt intermediaries and mitigating the effects of market manipulation, such systems can contribute to a more stable and predictable food market.

The challenges that Nigeria faces in its quest to overcome food insecurity are emblematic of broader structural issues that affect not only the agricultural sector but the entire socio-economic fabric of the country. The convergence of environmental, economic, and political factors has created a scenario in which food scarcity is both a symptom and a cause of deeper systemic problems. The legacy of decades-long neglect of agriculture, combined with the disruptive effects of conflict and climate change, has left Nigeria at a crossroads. The need for a strategic, well-coordinated response that addresses both immediate humanitarian concerns and long-term structural reforms is more urgent than ever.

In contemplating the path forward, it is clear that Nigeria’s food crisis is not an isolated phenomenon but rather a reflection of global challenges that many nations face in an era marked by rapid environmental change and economic instability. The interplay between local agricultural practices and global market forces underscores the importance of a balanced approach that leverages both domestic resources and international support. As the government and its partners work to rebuild the agricultural sector, it is imperative that policies are not only well-intentioned but also effectively implemented on the ground. This involves a reassessment of current agricultural policies, increased investment in infrastructure, and the adoption of innovative technologies that can help modernize the food system.

Bottom line, Nigeria’s current food insecurity is the product of a complex mosaic of factors that have converged over decades. The crisis, marked by high levels of poverty, conflict, climate volatility, and policy shortcomings, presents a formidable challenge that demands both immediate relief and long-term strategic planning. The government’s recent initiatives, coupled with support from international bodies, signal a renewed commitment to reviving the agricultural sector. However, the task remains daunting as the nation strives to balance the urgent needs of today with the imperative of building a resilient food system for tomorrow. The coming years will be critical in determining whether Nigeria can transform its agricultural landscape and ensure that every citizen has access to the nourishment they need to thrive.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...