Skip to main content

The Institute for the Study of War Gives Reason Why Russia is Moving Military Equipment at Syrian Bases

In a significant development, Russia appears to be preparing for a partial military withdrawal from Syria, as evidenced by recent movements of military equipment and personnel. Analysts have highlighted satellite imagery showing a buildup of military vehicles at key Russian-controlled sites, including a port and an airbase in western Syria. This movement is believed to indicate a strategic shift, possibly in response to the changing political landscape following the fall of Bashar al-Assad's government.

Satellite images have revealed a notable increase in military vehicles at the Russian-controlled port of Tartous and the Hmeimim airbase. Transport aircraft have been observed arriving and departing the country in recent days, suggesting the beginning phases of an evacuation or repositioning effort. BBC Verify has corroborated these observations, geolocating videos that show extensive columns of Russian military trucks moving north towards these bases.

The Institute for the Study of War, a Washington-based think tank, suggests that these movements indicate preparations for a reduction or complete withdrawal of Russian forces from Syria. The think tank posits that the relocation of military vehicles to key bases might be a precautionary measure as Moscow negotiates with the new government in Damascus.

Russia's military involvement in Syria has been significant, especially during the rule of Bashar al-Assad. Russian forces played a crucial role in helping Assad maintain power after the outbreak of the civil war in 2011. The strategic importance of Russia’s bases in Syria cannot be overstated. The port at Tartous, established by the Soviet Union in the 1970s and modernized by Russia in 2012, and the Hmeimim airbase, operational since 2015, have been pivotal in Russia's military operations across Syria.

These bases have also provided Russia with strategic advantages, offering easier access to the Middle East, North Africa, and the Mediterranean Sea. However, the recent political upheaval and the fall of Assad have raised questions about the future of Russia's military presence in the region.

On Monday, Kremlin press secretary Dmitry Peskov stated that there have been "no final decisions" regarding a withdrawal and that Russia remains "in contact with representatives of the forces that now control the situation in [Syria]." This statement aligns with the ongoing uncertainty and strategic deliberations within the Russian government.

BBC Verify has been closely monitoring activities at the Hmeimim airbase using Planet Labs satellite imagery. These images show sustained activity involving sizable military transport planes. Notably, two large Antonov An-124 aircraft, which are often used for moving heavy assets, were seen at the base on Friday. By Tuesday, these aircraft had departed, but two more large planes were observed at the base by Wednesday morning.

Additional imagery from Maxar Technologies taken on Sunday shows dozens of military vehicles parked at the airfield near a Russian-made Ilyushin Il-76 military transport plane. This setup could facilitate evacuations, indicating serious preparations for moving personnel and equipment.

BBC Verify tracked one of the large Russian Antonov An-124 aircraft using the plane tracking website Flightradar24. The aircraft was seen traveling over Russian airspace towards Syria but disappeared from public tracking off the Syrian coast, likely due to its tracker being switched off. The plane reappeared heading back north six hours later, reinforcing suspicions of covert logistical operations.

David Heathcote, intelligence manager at McKenzie Intelligence, highlighted the unusual activity at Hmeimim airbase, suggesting that Russia might be storing resources while preparing for a potential withdrawal. The rapid collapse of the Assad government likely disrupted any pre-existing evacuation plans, necessitating swift and possibly improvised adjustments.

Tayfun Ozberk, a former naval officer and defense analyst, agreed with this assessment, noting the early signs of a Russian withdrawal. The presence of Il-76 aircraft, the absence of Russian vessels at Tartous, and the organized pre-staging of vehicles and equipment all point towards an air-based evacuation strategy.

Recent reports indicated that Russian warships had left the port at Tartous, with analysts suggesting they were being stationed in international waters temporarily. These vessels have not returned, but satellite images show that over 100 military vehicles have arrived at the base in recent days. Heathcote noted that these vehicles are likely being prepared for evacuation, although the absence of loading ramps and cranes suggests that the process might not be immediate.

Recent footage also shows large columns of Russian vehicles on the move, indicating they have been redirected from various outposts across Syria. BBC Verify geolocated these movements to a major highway, suggesting the vehicles are heading north towards key bases.

One 80-second video published on social media platform X shows a long line of Russian vehicles geolocated to 30 kilometers south of Homs. Another video depicts a column of Russian vehicles on the same highway, 70 kilometers outside Damascus. Anton Mardasov, a non-resident scholar in the Middle East Institute’s Syria program, commented that Russia is now withdrawing units and military equipment previously deployed in nearly a hundred strongholds across the country.

The potential withdrawal of Russian forces from Syria marks a significant shift in the geopolitical landscape of the region. Russia’s military presence has been a cornerstone of its influence in the Middle East. A reduction or complete withdrawal would have far-reaching implications for regional stability and power dynamics.

As Russia negotiates with the new regime in Damascus, the future of its strategic bases at Tartous and Hmeimim remains uncertain. These bases have provided Russia with critical access and influence, and their status will be a key factor in any negotiations.

The international community will be closely monitoring these developments, as they could signal broader changes in Russian military strategy and foreign policy. The situation remains fluid, with analysts and experts continuing to assess the implications of Russia’s potential withdrawal from Syria.

While the final decision remains unconfirmed, the evidence suggests that Russia is reassessing its military strategy in light of the political changes in Damascus. The outcome of these deliberations will have significant implications for the future of Russian-Syrian relations and the broader geopolitical dynamics of the Middle East.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...