Skip to main content

Stakeholders Give Reason Why Nigeria Must Restructure or Face the Collapse of the Telecom Sector

Stakeholders in the telecommunications sector argue that Nigeria must restructure her economy or face the collapse of the sector because of the harsh economic environment confronting the sector.
The Nigerian telecommunications sector, once a beacon of economic growth and technological advancement, is now grappling with severe financial challenges as 2024 draws to a close. The sector, which has significantly contributed to Nigeria's Gross Domestic Product (GDP) over the past decade, is experiencing unprecedented financial strain.


The sector is burdened by a staggering N250 billion debt owed by the banking sector for Unstructured Supplementary Services Data (USSD) services. Additionally, rising operational costs, stagnant tariffs, and unfavorable macroeconomic conditions are exacerbating the crisis. Industry operators and stakeholders are increasingly alarmed, as these issues threaten the sector's stability and future growth.

MTN Nigeria CEO, Karl Toriola, highlighted the dire situation at a recent event in Lagos, stating, "The telecoms sector is now in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU), and sooner than later, the breath will finally cease."


The sector faces numerous challenges, including repeated attacks on its facilities by vandals, government agencies, hoodlums, and cybercriminals. National Security Adviser Mallam Nuhu Ribadu expressed deep concern over these threats, which extend beyond telecommunications to other critical infrastructure such as banking platforms, power grids, and national databases. Ribadu emphasized the significant economic damage and tarnished international reputation resulting from these attacks.

Another major issue is the fragmented Right of Way (RoW) pricing regime. The lack of harmonization between state and federal government policies has hindered broadband deployment in 2024, leading to increased operational costs for telecom operators. Despite repeated requests, the government has refused to adjust tariffs, leaving operators to bear the brunt of multiple adjusted taxes and levies over the past eleven years.

The financial health of major players like MTN and Airtel has deteriorated, with both companies reporting substantial losses. A report from The Whistler indicated that MTN Nigeria and Airtel Africa collectively lost N271 billion in market capitalization in November 2024. This decline reflects shifting investor sentiment, with speculators redirecting funds in search of higher profits. Increased interest in fixed-income securities has also negatively impacted equities, particularly in the telecommunications sector.

Airtel Africa’s share price fell from N2,200.00 on October 31 to N2,156.90 per share by the end of November, reducing its market capitalization by N162 billion. Similarly, MTN Nigeria’s share price dropped from N175.10 in October to N170.00, resulting in a market capitalization decline of N109 billion.

The sector began 2024 with promise, attracting $191.5 million in capital inflow in the first quarter, a 769% increase compared to the $22.05 million recorded in the first quarter of 2023. However, this momentum was short-lived as structural challenges soon overshadowed initial gains.

Former OPay CEO and ex-Chief Marketing Officer at Airtel, Olu Akanmu, pointed out that telecom companies have refrained from investing due to foreign exchange (FX) losses that have eroded accounting profits over the last two years. He also criticized the regulator's refusal to adjust tariffs to reflect rising costs, making the situation untenable for operators.

A fresh crisis is looming between telecom operators and the banking sector over the lingering USSD debt, which has now exceeded N250 billion. The Chairman of the Association of Licensed Telecommunications Operators of Nigeria (ALTON), Gbenga Adebayo, revealed that banks have not complied with the agreed repayment plan. He warned that if banks fail to honor the agreement, telecom operators may withdraw USSD services, severely disrupting online banking operations.

To address the sector's challenges, stakeholders are urging regulators and policymakers to prioritize long-term sustainability. They advocate for measures to create a conducive investment environment, including tariff adjustments to counter FX and inflation-driven cost increases.

Economist and telecom sector enthusiast, Demola Akinbo, highlighted broader macroeconomic issues affecting the sector, such as multiple naira devaluations, persistent inflation, and an unstable exchange rate. These factors have significantly eroded the value of foreign investments, making investors hesitant to commit capital.

For a more stable 2025, stakeholders recommend several measures:

1. Strengthening Nigeria’s ability to export locally produced goods to stabilize the naira and attract foreign investments.
2. Encouraging the consumption of locally produced goods to cut reliance on imports.
3. Setting a fixed exchange rate ceiling for foreign transactions to make the investment climate more predictable.

Chief Deolu Ogubanjo, President of the National Association of Telecom Subscribers (NATCOMS), emphasized the need to address the high cost of doing business in the telecom industry. He pointed out that FX rates have soared, interest rates have climbed, and the cost of diesel, crucial for maintaining telecom infrastructure, has become significantly more expensive. Yet, tariffs remain at 2018 levels, making it nearly impossible to sustain operations and invest in network expansions.

The Nigerian telecommunications sector is at a critical juncture, facing immense challenges that threaten its sustainability and growth. Immediate and decisive action is needed to address these issues, including tariff adjustments, regulatory reforms, and measures to stabilize the macroeconomic environment. Without these changes, the sector, which plays a vital role in Nigeria's economy, risks further decline and potential collapse.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...