Skip to main content

Why Nigeria Should Reduce Unemployment and Underemployment in the Country?

In recent months, a chorus of Nigerian scholars has emerged, urging the nation’s leaders and policymakers to take decisive action to reduce both unemployment and underemployment—a dual challenge that is undermining the country’s economic potential and social cohesion. These experts, drawing from extensive research and comparative studies with global trends, have presented a multifaceted explanation of why the persistence of joblessness is not only an economic dilemma but also a profound societal threat. Their analysis underscores that the issue is deeply rooted in a variety of interconnected factors that include economic fluctuations, rapid technological advancements, the pressures of globalization, systemic gaps in education and training, and ingrained biases that perpetuate discrimination in the workplace.

At the heart of their argument lies the observation that economic fluctuations have long served as a barometer for a nation’s job market. In Nigeria, as in many other economies, periods of economic downturn lead to reduced consumer spending and lower business revenues. This decline forces companies to adopt cost-cutting measures, which frequently manifest as layoffs or hiring freezes. Scholars note that such cyclical economic contractions not only destabilize individual livelihoods but also erode consumer confidence, thereby setting in motion a vicious cycle of reduced production and further job losses. They point out that while times of economic expansion do offer a reprieve by creating more employment opportunities, these positive phases are often short-lived and not inclusive enough to address the structural issues that have left many Nigerians trapped in precarious positions or engaged in work that does not fully utilize their potential.

Moreover, the rapid pace of technological advancement presents a double-edged sword in the labor market. While new technologies drive efficiency and innovation, they also render many traditional jobs obsolete. This phenomenon, known as structural unemployment, has been documented in various sectors of the Nigerian economy, where outdated skill sets can no longer meet the evolving demands of modern industries. The scholars emphasize that as industries integrate advanced machinery and automated processes, there is an increasing mismatch between the skills possessed by the workforce and those demanded by the market. They argue that without targeted interventions—such as retraining programs and educational reforms—this mismatch could widen the gap between job seekers and available opportunities, further exacerbating the unemployment crisis. In this context, the transition to new technologies becomes not just a matter of modernization but also a critical factor in maintaining social stability and economic progress.

Globalization also plays a significant role in shaping Nigeria’s employment landscape. The global economic environment has allowed for the relocation of manufacturing and service sector jobs to regions where labor is less expensive and skill sets are more abundant. For Nigeria, this trend has meant a loss of traditional job sectors that once provided stable employment for many citizens. The scholars argue that while globalization can foster economic growth by opening new markets and attracting foreign investment, it can also lead to significant job displacement when domestic industries are unable to compete with international players. This competition, they assert, necessitates a proactive approach from policymakers to ensure that Nigerian workers are not left behind in the global race for economic relevance.

A critical factor contributing to the unemployment problem, as identified by these scholars, is the lack of access to quality education and vocational training. In many parts of the country, the education system is struggling to keep pace with the demands of a rapidly changing job market. Without a solid educational foundation and opportunities for continuous skill development, many individuals find themselves ill-equipped to compete for available jobs or to adapt to new occupational roles created by technological and economic shifts. This deficit in education not only limits personal advancement but also hampers the country’s broader economic development. Scholars stress that investing in education and training is essential for cultivating a workforce that is resilient, adaptable, and capable of driving innovation and productivity in the face of future challenges.

In addition to these economic and educational factors, the issue of discrimination and bias in the workplace has been highlighted as a significant barrier to employment and career progression. Despite possessing the requisite qualifications and skills, many Nigerians continue to face systemic barriers based on gender, ethnicity, age, or disability. Such biases not only limit the potential of individuals but also lead to an underutilization of the country’s human capital. The scholars emphasize that discrimination creates an uneven playing field where capable and talented individuals are sidelined, thus reinforcing cycles of poverty and underemployment. They call for comprehensive policy reforms that promote diversity and inclusion in the labor market, arguing that a fairer system would better harness the full range of talents available to Nigeria.

The consequences of unemployment extend far beyond the immediate financial hardships experienced by individuals, neccessitating the urgent need to reduce it with underemployment in Nigeria. In fact, on a broader scale, high unemployment rates have significant adverse effects on the economy, including a reduction in consumer spending, which is a critical driver of economic growth. When large segments of the population are unable to earn a stable income, the overall demand for goods and services declines, leading to lower production levels and potentially triggering further layoffs. This economic slowdown can strain public resources, as governments are forced to allocate more funds to social welfare programs while simultaneously losing tax revenue—a dynamic that threatens long-term fiscal stability. Additionally, scholars warn that persistent unemployment can lead to social unrest, as communities grappling with high levels of joblessness may experience increased rates of crime and a deterioration in the social fabric that binds them together.

Despite these daunting challenges, the scholars remain optimistic about the potential for transformative change. They advocate for a range of innovative solutions aimed at reversing the trends of unemployment and underemployment. Among the proposed strategies is the implementation of robust vocational training and job placement programs that align closely with industry needs. By equipping individuals with the specific skills required in modern job markets, such initiatives could significantly reduce the mismatch between supply and demand in the labor force. Furthermore, scholars suggest that supporting small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) through incentives and resources could spur job creation at the grassroots level, thereby addressing the issue from the bottom up. They also emphasize the importance of fostering an entrepreneurial culture that encourages individuals to explore self-employment and start their own businesses, which in turn can generate employment opportunities for others and contribute to the diversification of the economy.

The role of mentorship and sustained support throughout the transition process has also been identified as critical in ensuring long-term career success. Scholars argue that continuous guidance from experienced professionals can help newly trained workers navigate the complexities of the modern job market, thus increasing their chances of sustained employment and career progression. They highlight successful international examples where organizations have integrated such mentorship models into their training programs, leading to impressive outcomes in terms of graduate employment rates and overall economic contribution.

In the Nigerian context, these recommendations take on an even greater urgency. The nation’s youth, which constitutes a significant portion of the population, are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of unemployment. Scholars warn that failure to address these issues could lead to a generation of young people who are not only underemployed but also disenfranchised, thereby undermining the country’s future economic prospects. They call for concerted efforts from both public and private sectors to invest in education, vocational training, and policies that promote a more inclusive and dynamic labor market. By addressing the root causes of unemployment and underemployment, Nigeria could not only improve the quality of life for its citizens but also unlock the full potential of its economic and social capital.

The discourse among Nigerian scholars reflects a deep-seated belief that reducing unemployment is not merely a matter of economic necessity but a moral imperative. They argue that every individual deserves the opportunity to contribute meaningfully to society and to achieve personal fulfillment through gainful employment. In their view, a reduction in unemployment and underemployment would pave the way for a more equitable society where economic opportunities are accessible to all, regardless of background or circumstance.

Ultimately, the call to reduce unemployment and underemployment in Nigeria is a call for a comprehensive reevaluation of the country’s economic and social policies. The scholars’ insights serve as a clarion call for transformative action—one that requires collaboration across all sectors of society. As Nigeria grapples with the challenges of a rapidly changing global economy, the voices of these experts remind us that addressing unemployment is essential for achieving sustainable development, social stability, and long-term prosperity. Their recommendations, grounded in both global best practices and a deep understanding of local challenges, offer a roadmap for a future where every Nigerian has the chance to thrive in a robust and inclusive economy.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...