Skip to main content

Why Nigeria Should Support the Micro, Small and Medium Scale Enterprises in Its Economy?

In recent times, a growing body of research has underscored the indispensable role that micro, small, and medium scale enterprises (MSMEs) play in the sustainable growth and development of emerging economies. In Nigeria, a nation rich in human capital and entrepreneurial spirit, this research has taken on a renewed urgency, highlighting the multifaceted benefits of supporting these enterprises. MSMEs are not only the backbone of many economies, representing a vast majority of all business activities, but they also serve as vital engines of innovation, employment, and inclusive growth. For Nigeria, the imperative to nurture and support these enterprises is clear: doing so could catalyze transformative change across the nation’s economic landscape and promote a future of prosperity and stability.


Economic studies from various emerging markets reveal that MSMEs constitute more than 95% of all businesses, contribute nearly 50% of the gross domestic product, and generate between 60% to 70% of total employment. Such statistics speak volumes about the potential of these enterprises to drive widespread economic participation and reduce disparities. In Nigeria, where economic opportunities are often concentrated in a few sectors and urban centers, MSMEs provide a unique avenue for diversifying the economy and promoting regional development. By tapping into the latent energy of countless small-scale ventures—from agriculture and manufacturing to technology and service industries—Nigeria can harness the power of local innovation and create jobs that resonate throughout every community.


The vibrant energy of Nigeria’s MSME sector is a testament to the resilience and adaptability of its entrepreneurs. These businesses, by nature, operate on a smaller scale compared to multinational corporations and large domestic firms, which allows them the flexibility to respond swiftly to local market demands and global economic trends. Their agility enables them to introduce innovative products and services, often tailored to meet specific regional needs. This capacity for rapid adaptation is a significant advantage in today’s fast-paced and ever-changing global economy, where consumer preferences and technological advances evolve continuously. Nigerian entrepreneurs, armed with local knowledge and a keen sense of innovation, are well positioned to fill niche markets that larger companies might overlook, thereby spurring competition that ultimately benefits consumers through improved quality and lower prices.


One of the most compelling arguments for bolstering Nigeria’s MSME sector lies in its potential for job creation. With a predominantly young population and a high rate of urbanization, Nigeria faces the dual challenge of providing meaningful employment opportunities while simultaneously harnessing the creative and entrepreneurial energies of its citizens. MSMEs have consistently demonstrated their ability to absorb labor, including individuals with limited formal education and specialized skills. By offering accessible avenues for economic participation, these enterprises help to reduce unemployment and underemployment, particularly among youth and marginalized groups. In doing so, they not only generate income for countless families but also empower individuals to contribute actively to their communities and the nation’s economic progress.


Beyond the immediate economic benefits of job creation and innovation, MSMEs are also instrumental in fostering social inclusion and regional development. Many of these enterprises are deeply rooted in the communities they serve, often reinvesting their profits locally and driving a cycle of economic activity that benefits a wide array of stakeholders. This localized impact is particularly significant in Nigeria, where development has historically been uneven, with certain regions experiencing robust growth while others lag behind. By encouraging the growth of MSMEs across the country, policymakers can help to balance regional disparities and promote a more equitable distribution of wealth. The multiplier effect generated by thriving small and medium businesses can lead to improvements in local infrastructure, education, and healthcare, ultimately contributing to a higher quality of life for communities that have long been underserved.


However, despite the undeniable potential of MSMEs to act as engines of growth and innovation, several challenges stand in the way of their full realization in Nigeria. Access to finance remains a persistent barrier, as many small-scale entrepreneurs struggle to secure the necessary capital to start or expand their businesses. Traditional banking institutions often view these ventures as high-risk, a perception that is compounded by limited collateral and a lack of formal financial records. This situation necessitates the development of more flexible and accessible financing options, such as microfinance institutions, venture capital funds, and government-backed loan schemes specifically tailored to the needs of MSMEs. By broadening the availability of credit, Nigeria can empower entrepreneurs to invest in new technologies, scale their operations, and compete more effectively in both domestic and international markets.


In addition to financial constraints, Nigerian MSMEs often face significant infrastructural challenges. The availability of reliable electricity, efficient transportation networks, and modern communication systems is critical to the smooth operation of any business. Yet, in many parts of Nigeria, these fundamental services remain inconsistent or underdeveloped. Such infrastructural deficiencies not only increase the cost of doing business but also hinder productivity and innovation. Addressing these challenges will require concerted investment from both the public and private sectors. Upgrading infrastructure is not simply a matter of improving living standards; it is a strategic necessity that can unlock the full potential of the MSME sector and drive national economic growth.


Regulatory burdens also play a significant role in hampering the growth of MSMEs in Nigeria. Cumbersome bureaucratic procedures and complex compliance requirements often discourage entrepreneurs from formalizing their businesses or expanding beyond a local scale. These regulatory hurdles can create an environment where innovation is stifled and entrepreneurial risk is magnified. To foster a more vibrant business climate, Nigerian authorities must undertake comprehensive policy reforms aimed at streamlining administrative processes and reducing unnecessary red tape. Simplified regulations would not only lower the barriers to entry for aspiring entrepreneurs but also encourage existing businesses to innovate and grow without the constant fear of punitive measures. Such reforms, coupled with proactive government support, can transform the landscape for MSMEs and pave the way for sustainable economic development.


Moreover, capacity building and technical training are critical components of a robust MSME strategy. Many small and medium scale enterprises operate with limited access to contemporary business practices and modern technological tools, which can inhibit their ability to compete on a larger scale. Providing targeted training programs and mentorship opportunities can bridge this gap, equipping Nigerian entrepreneurs with the skills they need to harness new technologies, optimize their operations, and explore untapped markets. By fostering a culture of continuous learning and innovation, Nigeria can ensure that its MSME sector remains dynamic and competitive in the face of global challenges. These capacity-building initiatives are not just investments in individual businesses; they are investments in the future of the entire nation, cultivating a generation of innovators who are prepared to drive economic transformation.


Market access is another pivotal factor in the success of MSMEs. Many small-scale enterprises in Nigeria are confined to local markets due to limited resources, inadequate marketing capabilities, and a lack of exposure to broader consumer bases. Expanding market access through improved trade policies, export promotion programs, and digital platforms can significantly enhance the competitiveness of Nigerian MSMEs. By breaking down the barriers to both domestic and international markets, policymakers can create opportunities for these businesses to scale up and diversify their operations. Such measures would not only increase revenue streams for individual enterprises but also contribute to the overall resilience of the Nigerian economy by reducing dependence on a narrow range of industries.


The cumulative evidence makes a persuasive case for why Nigeria should prioritize the support and development of its medium and small scale enterprises. Researchers and economic experts alike agree that the MSME sector holds the key to unlocking sustainable, inclusive growth in an era characterized by rapid technological change and evolving global markets. The benefits of such support extend far beyond mere economic statistics; they encompass social progress, regional balance, and the creation of an entrepreneurial culture that values innovation and resilience. By addressing critical issues such as access to finance, infrastructural deficits, regulatory inefficiencies, and limited market exposure, Nigeria can create a fertile environment where MSMEs are not only able to survive but thrive.


The call to action is both clear and urgent. Nigerian policymakers, financial institutions, and development partners must collaborate to develop comprehensive strategies that address the myriad challenges facing the MSME sector. This includes implementing financial reforms to ease credit constraints, investing in critical infrastructure improvements, simplifying regulatory frameworks, and launching capacity-building initiatives that equip entrepreneurs with the tools they need to succeed. The success of these measures would reverberate throughout the economy, leading to a more diversified, resilient, and dynamic economic system that benefits all Nigerians.


In essence, the support of MSMEs is not merely an economic strategy; it is a pathway to national empowerment. By fostering an environment where small and medium scale enterprises can flourish, Nigeria stands to gain not only in terms of GDP growth and employment creation but also in the broader context of social and regional development. The entrepreneurial spirit that has long been a hallmark of Nigerian society can be harnessed to drive forward a new era of innovation, inclusivity, and progress. Researchers emphasize that the transformative impact of MSMEs extends beyond immediate economic gains; it has the potential to reshape the social fabric of the nation by promoting self-reliance, encouraging local innovation, and reducing economic disparities.


Ultimately, the evidence is compelling. The case for supporting MSMEs in Nigeria is rooted in the very essence of what makes emerging markets thrive: a dynamic interplay of innovation, resilience, and inclusive growth. The transformation of Nigeria’s economic landscape hinges on the ability of its policymakers to recognize and nurture the potential of these enterprises. The journey toward a more prosperous and equitable Nigeria will be challenging, but the rewards—ranging from increased job creation and economic diversification to enhanced social cohesion—are well worth the effort. By investing in its MSME sector, Nigeria is investing in its own future, laying the foundation for a society where every citizen has the opportunity to participate in and benefit from the nation’s growth. The message from the research community is unequivocal: a vibrant MSME sector is the cornerstone of sustainable development, and by supporting it, Nigeria can ensure that its economy not only recovers but flourishes in the years to come.



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...