Skip to main content

Reasons Why Political Science is a Science

In the realm of academia and intellectual inquiry, the debate over whether political science should be classified as a science or regarded as an art has long been a subject of both passionate discussion and rigorous analysis. The question is not merely academic; it touches upon the very nature of how we understand political phenomena and the ways in which scholars attempt to decode the intricacies of governance, political behavior, and public policy. Historically, some of the most influential thinkers in the field have contributed to this debate, with figures such as Aristotle, Niccolò Machiavelli, Max Weber, and David Easton offering perspectives that illuminate both the systematic and interpretative aspects of political inquiry. Although there exists a spectrum of opinions on the matter, many proponents of the scientific approach to political science have given quite a convincing argument as hereunder presented. Political Science employs systematic methods of inquiry, relies on empirical evidence, and develops predictive theories that mirror the methodologies found in the natural sciences, and these credentials certify the discipline as scientific in nature.

At the core of the argument that political science is a science is its commitment to systematic study and methodological rigor. Political scientists meticulously design studies and utilize a variety of research methods to collect data on political systems, behaviors, and institutions. This process often involves the use of case studies, carefully structured surveys, controlled experiments, and sophisticated statistical analyses. Each of these methods contributes to a body of research that is not only replicable but also capable of yielding insights that are both consistent and reliable. When political scientists engage in empirical research, they are guided by a commitment to objectivity and a structured approach that mirrors the scientific method. In this regard, the discipline is comparable to fields such as sociology and economics, where systematic investigation and methodological consistency are the hallmarks of scientific inquiry.

The reliance on empirical evidence further bolsters the claim that political science is a science. Researchers in this field gather data through a multitude of means—observations in natural settings, surveys of public opinion, experiments that test hypotheses about behavior, and longitudinal studies that trace political trends over extended periods. Once collected, this data is subjected to rigorous analysis aimed at identifying patterns, correlations, and causal relationships. For instance, a political scientist might analyze electoral data to uncover the underlying factors that drive voter behavior, or they may examine public policy outcomes to determine the efficacy of governmental interventions. The process of data collection and analysis is not merely an academic exercise; it is a systematic effort to understand the real-world implications of political actions and to develop theories that can explain and predict future events.

Central to the scientific approach in political science is the development of theories and models that seek to explain political behavior and events. These theories, which include frameworks like the democratic peace theory and rational choice theory, are constructed based on empirical data and refined over time through continual testing and revision. Political scientists, much like scientists in other disciplines, work to create models that not only describe observed phenomena but also predict outcomes in various political contexts. This iterative process of theory formation, testing, and refinement underscores the dynamic nature of political science as a discipline that is continually evolving and adapting to new data and changing circumstances. Theories in political science provide structured explanations that help policymakers, scholars, and citizens alike to make sense of complex political dynamics.

Beyond the development of theories, political science also demonstrates a notable degree of predictive and explanatory power. By applying established models and empirical findings, political scientists are often able to forecast political events or trends with a reasonable degree of accuracy. For example, through the application of statistical models and historical analysis, researchers can predict the likelihood of electoral outcomes or the potential impact of legislative changes. This predictive capacity is not only a testament to the discipline’s scientific underpinnings but also a practical asset for those who need to navigate the complexities of political decision-making. When political scientists can offer forecasts or explanatory insights that inform policy debates and guide governmental actions, it reinforces the notion that the discipline is grounded in a systematic approach to understanding political phenomena.

The academic rigor that defines political science is also evident in its commitment to peer review and critical scrutiny. Research findings in political science are typically subjected to a rigorous process of evaluation by experts in the field before they are published in scholarly journals. This peer review process serves as a quality control mechanism, ensuring that the research methods, analyses, and conclusions are robust and reliable. The scrutiny that research undergoes is comparable to that found in the natural sciences, where only work that meets high standards of evidence and methodological soundness is accepted by the academic community. This commitment to academic rigor not only enhances the credibility of political science as a discipline but also fosters an environment where continuous improvement and scholarly debate are encouraged.

Within the framework of higher education, political science is consistently categorized alongside other recognized sciences such as economics, sociology, and psychology. This academic classification reflects a broader consensus that political science shares fundamental characteristics with these disciplines, particularly in its use of systematic methods and empirical research. The inclusion of political science in the suite of social sciences underscores its role as a discipline that is both rigorous and methodologically grounded. Academic institutions, through their curriculum and research initiatives, have further cemented the status of political science as a field that adheres to the principles of scientific inquiry, thus providing a structured approach to understanding complex social phenomena.

One of the most compelling aspects of political science as a discipline is its progressive development of knowledge. Over the centuries, the field has undergone significant evolution, with successive generations of scholars building upon the work of their predecessors. From the early philosophical musings of ancient thinkers to the sophisticated statistical analyses of contemporary research, political science has continuously refined its methods and expanded its theoretical frameworks. This historical progression not only highlights the discipline’s capacity for growth and adaptation but also serves as evidence of its scientific nature. As new data becomes available and new analytical techniques are developed, political scientists are able to revisit established theories and modify them in light of fresh evidence, ensuring that the discipline remains responsive to the ever-changing political landscape.

Moreover, the practical utility of political science further exemplifies its scientific credentials. The insights derived from political research have tangible applications in the realms of public policy, international relations, and governance. For instance, the analytical tools and models developed by political scientists are routinely employed to assess the effectiveness of policy measures, design electoral systems, and formulate strategies for conflict resolution. These practical applications demonstrate that the discipline is not confined to theoretical abstraction; rather, it has a profound impact on real-world outcomes. The ability of political science to translate empirical research into actionable policy recommendations is a clear indicator of its scientific orientation and its commitment to addressing the challenges faced by modern societies.

Another dimension of political science that reinforces its status as a science is its interdisciplinary nature. Political science frequently intersects with other fields of study such as economics, sociology, anthropology, and history. This interdisciplinary approach allows for a more holistic understanding of political phenomena, as it draws upon a diverse range of analytical perspectives and methodologies. By integrating insights from various disciplines, political science is able to tackle complex questions that cannot be adequately addressed by a single field alone. This synthesis of ideas not only enriches the study of politics but also reinforces the scientific foundations of the discipline, as it demonstrates a willingness to engage with multiple lines of inquiry and to adopt a comprehensive approach to understanding human behavior and societal organization.

Furthermore, political scientists place a strong emphasis on objective analysis and neutrality in their work. In striving to provide unbiased assessments of political events and behaviors, they rely on evidence-based research and rigorous analytical techniques. The commitment to objectivity ensures that personal biases and ideological leanings do not unduly influence the conclusions drawn from empirical research. This emphasis on neutrality is a cornerstone of scientific inquiry, as it allows for the development of theories and models that are based on observable facts rather than subjective opinions. The pursuit of objective analysis in political science not only enhances the credibility of the discipline but also contributes to its overall scientific legitimacy.

The synthesis of these various elements—systematic methodology, empirical evidence, theoretical development, predictive power, academic rigor, interdisciplinary collaboration, and a commitment to objective analysis—forms the foundation of the argument that political science is indeed a science. This perspective is rooted in the belief that the methods employed by political scientists are designed to produce reliable, testable, and generalizable insights about the political world. It is through this lens that the discipline is able to offer meaningful contributions to our understanding of governance, public policy, and political behavior. By embracing the scientific method, political science is able to navigate the complexities of modern political systems and to provide frameworks that are essential for both academic inquiry and practical decision-making.

In essence, the study of political science is an endeavor that is characterized by its adherence to systematic inquiry and its reliance on empirical data to construct and refine theories. While debates about whether it should be considered a science or an art may persist, the weight of evidence suggests that the discipline embodies the key features of a scientific field. The ongoing evolution of political science, driven by both historical insights and contemporary research, underscores its dynamic nature and its capacity to adapt to the challenges of an ever-changing political environment. As political scientists continue to apply rigorous methods of analysis to the study of power, governance, and public policy, they contribute not only to the academic body of knowledge but also to the practical understanding of the political forces that shape our societies.

The journey of political science from its early philosophical roots to its current status as a rigorous and methodologically sound discipline illustrates its dual capacity for theoretical innovation and practical application. The interplay between empirical research and theoretical development has allowed political science to carve out a distinct niche within the broader landscape of the social sciences. It is this balance between abstract inquiry and concrete analysis that has enabled the field to maintain its relevance and to offer profound insights into the mechanisms that govern political life. As the discipline continues to evolve, the principles of systematic study, empirical evidence, and objective analysis will undoubtedly remain at the forefront of its endeavors, reinforcing the view that political science is indeed a science.

Thus, while the question of whether political science is an art or a science may invite diverse opinions, a closer examination reveals that its methodological rigor, reliance on empirical data, and commitment to objective inquiry firmly establish it as a scientific discipline. The historical progression of political thought, coupled with the modern techniques of data analysis and theory development, provides a compelling case for viewing political science through the same lens as other established scientific fields. In the end, the systematic nature of political research and its ability to produce replicable, predictive, and actionable insights underscore its status as a science—a discipline that not only enhances our understanding of political phenomena but also offers practical solutions to the challenges faced by contemporary societies.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...