Skip to main content

Reasons Why EFCC Was Established, and Its Functions in Nigeria

In recent discussions among government officials and financial watchdogs across Nigeria, considerable emphasis has been placed on understanding the inception and evolution of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) as an agency designed to combat the complex and pervasive threat of economic and financial crimes. The EFCC was established at a time when Nigeria was grappling with a surge in sophisticated financial malpractices and criminal activities that threatened not only the integrity of its economic systems but also the trust of its citizens in public institutions. A robust mechanism to investigate, prosecute, and ultimately penalize those who sought to exploit the nation’s financial systems for illicit gain was the rationale behind the formation of the EFCC in Nigeria. 

From its inception, the EFCC was envisaged as more than just a law enforcement body; it was to serve as a sentinel against the myriad forms of financial crimes that had become increasingly common in Nigeria. These crimes ranged from traditional bank fraud to more modern forms of deceit such as advance fee fraud and sophisticated money laundering schemes. The commission was tasked with the investigation of all financial crimes, a mandate that encompassed everything from counterfeiting and illegal fund transfers to futures market fraud and contract scams. In essence, the EFCC was created to address not only the symptoms of economic criminality but also its root causes, ensuring that those who participated in fraudulent activities would face the full force of the law.

At the heart of the EFCC’s mission was the coordination and enforcement of all economic and financial crimes laws. This meant that the commission was not simply an investigative body but also an enforcement agency with the authority to bring perpetrators to justice. It was empowered to adopt measures that enabled it to identify, trace, freeze, confiscate, or seize the proceeds derived from terrorist activities and other forms of economic exploitation. This comprehensive approach was seen as essential in a nation where the financial networks often spanned both local and international borders, making traditional law enforcement strategies inadequate. Officials have continually stressed that the ability of the EFCC to track and intercept illicit funds was a cornerstone of its operational strategy, one that not only disrupted the immediate activities of criminals but also sent a broader message to potential offenders about the risks of engaging in such conduct.

Moreover, the establishment of the EFCC was intrinsically linked to a broader strategy aimed at eradicating economic and financial crimes from the Nigerian system altogether. Recognizing that prevention was as important as punishment, the EFCC was charged with the responsibility of adopting innovative methods to deter the commission of these crimes. This included working in tandem with other government bodies, both within Nigeria and on the international stage, to ensure a coordinated and effective response to criminal activities that often transcended national boundaries. The commission’s efforts in fostering collaboration among various agencies have been pivotal in establishing a network of accountability and oversight, which in turn has contributed to a more secure economic environment.

A particularly important aspect of the EFCC’s mandate is its role in education and enlightenment campaigns aimed at combating economic and financial crimes. Officials have highlighted that one of the fundamental reasons behind the establishment of the commission was the need to create widespread awareness about the negative impacts of financial crimes on the nation’s economy and on the lives of ordinary Nigerians. Through public education initiatives, the EFCC has sought to inform citizens about the dangers of falling victim to financial scams, as well as to educate potential offenders about the severe consequences of engaging in fraudulent activities. This dual approach of enforcement and education has been instrumental in creating a culture of accountability and has significantly contributed to efforts aimed at sanitizing the economic system.

The legislative framework that underpins the EFCC’s operations was solidified with the enactment of the EFCC Establishment Act in 2002, a law that was later amended in 2004 to better address the evolving nature of financial crimes. This Act provided the legal mandate for the commission, empowering it to prevent, investigate, prosecute, and penalize a wide range of economic and financial crimes. It was through this Act that the EFCC was given the authority to execute the provisions of other critical laws and regulations related to financial malpractices, thereby creating a comprehensive legal framework that could effectively target the multifaceted nature of financial crimes. Among the laws that were incorporated into this framework were the Money Laundering Act of 1995, which had long been a cornerstone of Nigeria’s efforts to combat illicit financial flows, and its subsequent prohibition act in 2004, which sought to close loopholes that allowed money laundering to proliferate.

Furthermore, the commission was tasked with the enforcement of other significant pieces of legislation such as the Advance Fee Fraud and Other Fraud Related Offences Act of 1995, a law that targeted one of the most notorious forms of financial fraud affecting the country. This Act was particularly important in light of the rampant advance fee fraud schemes that had inflicted significant financial losses on individuals and institutions alike. In addition, the Failed Banks (Recovery of Debts) and Financial Malpractices in Banks Act of 1994 provided the EFCC with the tools necessary to address issues arising from the collapse of financial institutions due to mismanagement and malpractices. The commission was also empowered by the Banks and other Financial Institutions Act of 1991, which offered a regulatory framework for overseeing the operations of banks and other financial bodies, thereby ensuring that they adhered to stringent standards of transparency and accountability.

Officials have argued that the integration of these various laws into the EFCC’s mandate was a deliberate effort to create a synergistic legal framework that could more effectively tackle the multifaceted challenges posed by economic and financial crimes. In addition to these laws, the EFCC’s responsibilities were further reinforced by provisions in the Miscellaneous Offences Act of 1985 and the provisions of the Criminal Code and the Penal Code, which together formed a robust legal bulwark against criminal activities. The inclusion of the Terrorism Act of 2011 into the EFCC’s purview underscored the recognition that economic crimes and terrorism often share common financial underpinnings. By targeting the proceeds of terrorist activities, the commission not only aimed to disrupt funding streams but also sought to dismantle networks that exploited financial systems to further their destructive agendas.

In essence, the establishment of the EFCC was driven by a confluence of factors that converged at a critical juncture in Nigeria’s economic and political history. The rising tide of financial crimes had reached a level where it threatened to undermine the very foundations of the nation’s financial integrity. The prevalence of advance fee fraud, money laundering, and other sophisticated financial scams had created an environment of distrust, where citizens and investors alike were wary of engaging in financial transactions for fear of being defrauded. This environment was further exacerbated by the failure of traditional law enforcement mechanisms to keep pace with the ingenuity and adaptability of financial criminals.

The decision to create a specialized commission dedicated to fighting economic and financial crimes was therefore seen as an essential measure to restore confidence in Nigeria’s financial institutions and to promote a culture of transparency and accountability. By establishing a dedicated agency with the mandate to investigate, prosecute, and penalize financial crimes, the government of Nigeria signaled its commitment to upholding the rule of law and protecting the interests of its citizens. This commitment was further underscored by the EFCC’s proactive approach in working with international partners and regulatory bodies, thereby positioning Nigeria as a key player in the global fight against financial criminality.

The ongoing efforts of the EFCC have not only led to the recovery of significant sums of money but have also contributed to a broader understanding of the mechanisms that underpin financial crimes. Through its relentless pursuit of justice, the commission has provided valuable insights into the modus operandi of financial criminals and has helped to identify systemic weaknesses that allowed these crimes to flourish. The knowledge gained from these investigations has informed policy reforms and has driven improvements in regulatory frameworks, thereby creating a more resilient and secure financial system.

Bottom line, the establishment of the EFCC represents a decisive response to the multifaceted challenges posed by economic and financial crimes in Nigeria. It is a testament to the government’s resolve to safeguard the nation’s financial integrity and to protect the welfare of its citizens. The commission’s comprehensive mandate, which spans from investigation and prosecution to public education and international collaboration, embodies a holistic approach to combating financial criminality. As officials continue to discuss and analyze the reasons behind its establishment, it is clear that the EFCC plays a vital role in not only addressing the immediate threats posed by financial crimes but also in fostering a culture of transparency, accountability, and ethical conduct that is essential for the sustainable development of Nigeria’s economy.




Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Seven (7) Reasons for the Adoption of Federalism in Nigeria

INTRO: Federalism has been approached with variegated definitions to the extent that one might argue that there are as much definitions of federalism as there are authors on the subject. This notwithstanding, the concept of federalism boasts of a very popular definition by an American scholar, K.C. Wheare who contends that it is a system where powers are shared between central and regional governments so that each is in a sphere cordinate and independent. Reasons for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria include: 1. The Plural nature of Nigeria : Nigeria is a plural society of over 250 tongues and tribes. Besides the Big Three - Igbo, Hausa and Yoruba, there are other macro and micro ethnic minorities in the country. Federalism was favoured among other systems of government in a bid to allay both fancied and real fears of domination among the minorities. 2. The Size of Nigeria : This is another reason for the adoption of federalism in Nigeria. With the total area of...

Seven (7) Reasons for the Colonization of Nigeria

INTRO: Colonialism is a consistent theme in the history of Africa. It laces through the formative tapestry of the majority of African states today, Nigeria inclusive. Colonialism as a concept could be seen from different perspectives. Generally however, it may be defined as the practice or policy of controling a weaker nation by a stronger nation especially for socio-economic and political gains. The territory known today as Nigeria was colonized by Britain. The reasons for the colonization of Nigeria are  simply the same with the rest of African countries. In his masterpiece, "How Europe Underdeveloped Africa," Walter Rodney stated that Europe came to Africa with three Bs: Business, Bible and Bullet. These items represent perfectly the reasons for the notorious European incursion into the pristine and tranquil African continent, which are broadly categorized as economic, socio-political and religious reasons. A. Economic Reasons 1) Search for Raw Material : The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Adoption of Indirect Rule in Nigeria by Britain

INTRO:  The British colonial administrative policy in Nigeria known as the indirect rule was devised and adopted by the renowned British colonial officer, Lord Lugard, (although, there were semblances of the policy before Lugard). Lord Lugard was appointed the High Commissioner of the Northern Protectorate in 1900 following the revocation of the royal charter in the same year. The royal charter was given to the Royal Niger Company (RNC) in 1888 by the British government, to act on behalf of the government, chiefly towards instituting effective occupation in the colonies, as resolved in the Berlin Conference of 1884/85. Simply put, indirect rule is an administrative system in which the British colonial officials administered Nigeria through the intermediaries, the native authorities. According to Murray (1973, p. 1), indirect rule was an administrative policy that utilized native customs, traditions, institutions and people by fitting them into the British framework of colonial ad...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Causes of Political Apathy in Nigeria

INTRO:  Simply put, political apathy means lack of interest in politics, i.e. the activities of the state. More often than not, voter apathy is used interchangeably with political apathy. The interchangeable usage is understandable because voting is the hallmark of political participation, but then, it is careless to do so. As a matter of fact, every voter apathy is political apathy, but not every political apathy is voter apathy. Voter apathy is a subset of political apathy, together with other subsets of political apathy such interest apathy, and information apathy. A voter apathetic person does not go to cast vote in an election, interest apathetic person does not show interest in political activities such as referendum, demonstration, or rally, etc., and information apathetic person does not go for political news, or engage in political discussion. From the foregoing, it is observable that political apathy is the opposite of political participation. Democracies all over the wor...

Seven (7) Reasons for and Factors of the Nationalist Struggle in Nigeria

INTRO:   Nationalism has semantic nuances which range from patriotism to struggle for independence. As a matter of fact, all attitudes and actions for preservation of national identity and/or achievement of political independence are nationalism. Thus, xenophobia, ethnicity, terrorism, irredentism, separatism, and similar issues, all things being equal, are nationalist in nature. The term “nationalism” therefore is generally used to describe two phenomena : (i)          the attitude that the members of a nation have when they care about their national identity, and (ii)        the actions that the members of a nation take when seeking to achieve (or sustain) self-determination. Nationalism in Nigeria was directed against the colonial masters, first by the notable Nigerian chiefs who resisted, although unsuccessful, the loss of the sovereignty of their kingdoms, chiefdoms, and societies. Worthy of mention was ...

Nine (9) Reasons for the Creation of Local Government in Nigeria  

INTRO :  The nature and character of l ocal government in Nigeria today (except for few infractions) is largely the product of the 1976 Local Government Reform by the Murtala/Obasanjo regime. The Reform is marked with bringing uniformity to the cacophony and disharmony that once reigned on local government system in Nigeria. In the 1976 Local Government Reform Guidelines, the Federal Government of Nigeria defined local government as “Government at local levels exercised through representative councils established by law to exercise specific powers within defined areas.” The powers which the local representative councils can exercise within their jurisdiction are local affairs “(including staffing) and institutional and financial powers to initiate and to determine and implement projects so as to compliment the activities of the state and federal government in their areas, and ensure through devolution of functions to those councils and through the active participation of the people...

Five (5) Reasons for the January 15 1966 Coup in Nigeria

INTRO:   The January 15, 1966 military coup in Nigeria happened because of corruption by the officials, Western Nigeria crisis, intention to install Awolowo as the Head of State, the domino effect from coups outside Nigeria, and personal ambition of the coup plotters for joining the army. It was the first military coup in Nigeria. In its simplest terms, coup d'etat can be defined as the unconstitutional and violent overthrow of an incumbent government, especially, by the armed forces. Coup d'etat is more often than not, treated with scorn in the international comity of nations perhaps because it is believed that military in politics is an aberration. Nigeria, this central disapproval of military rule notwithstanding, has witnessed several coups and counter coups starting from January 15, 1966 when the military made its debut in the politics of the country. The coup toppled the coalition government of Northern Peoples Congress (NPC) and National Congress of Nigerian Citizens ...

Authors Give the Reasons Why Students Join Cults in Nigeria

Cultism in Nigeria is a pervasive social issue deeply entrenched in the nation’s socio-economic and cultural fabric. This phenomenon, particularly widespread in educational institutions, neighborhoods, and even political arenas, is marked by violent behaviors, initiation rites, and criminal activities. Its origins, as documented, trace back to 1952 with the establishment of the Seadog Confraternity (also known as the Pirates) by Nobel Laureate Professor Wole Soyinka and six others at the University of Ibadan . Initially set up as a peaceful and non-violent confraternity, it later evolved into secret cults characterized by violence and bizarre rituals. Today, cultism has morphed into a significant challenge in Nigeria, driven by a range of factors that appeal to different segments of the population. One of the primary reasons students join cults is peer pressure and social influence. In schools, students often face immense pressure from friends or acquaintances to join cult groups, esp...

Six (6) Reasons for the Relocation of Nigeria's Capital City from Lagos to Abuja

INTRO:   Several countries of the world have experimented with changing of the location of their capital cities. Countries such as Brazil moved her capital city from Rio de Janeiro to the built-for-the-purpose Brasilia in 1961; Kazakhstan moved from Almaty to Astana in 1997; and Cote d'Ivoire moved from Abijan to Yamoussoukro in 1983. In the year 1991, Nigeria joined the ranks of countries that for one reason or another relocated their capital cities when she moved her capital city from Lagos to Abuja.   The move was initiated in 1975 by the military government of General Murtala Mohammed when he set up a 7-man panel under the chairmanship of Dr. Akinola Aguda to examine the issue of a new capital city for Nigeria. The panel after  their studies recommended Abuja and the military government under Decree No. 6 of 1976 established the Federal Capital Development Authority to midwife the planning, designing and developing of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT). The ...

Nine (9) Reasons for and Causes of the Electoral Malpractices in Nigeria

INTRO : One of the features of the Nigerian democracy is periodic elections which come at the intervals of four years. Hence, there were general elections in Nigeria in 1999, 2003, 2007, 2011, 2015, 2019, and 2023 as at the time of this article. There are many component elections in a general election viz.: Presidential election, gubernatorial elections (i.e. governorship elections), National Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of the Houses of Representatives and Senate), and State Assembly elections (i.e. the elections of the members of Houses of Assembly of the States of the Federation). Since 1999, electoral malpractices have tainted these variegated elections in Nigeria. Electoral malpractices simply mean “illegalities committed by government, officials responsible for the conduct of elections, political parties, groups or individuals with sinister intention to influence an election in favour of a candidate(s).” (Ezeani, 2005, p. 415). These illegalities incl...